Thursday, November 4, 2010

Asian/emerging economies at breaking point:Ben Bernanke (Federal Reserve) is exporting US Dollar weakness.

Asia inflation wipe-out will come from China and should engulf the rest of Asia. China's engines that have being running too hot for too long with the added bonus now of the oil price marching to $90 and beyond. All thanks to Ben Bernanke and his US Dollar erosion policy, which then causes a speculative bubbles in Asia/emerging economies. Namely commodities prices blowing out, currencies blowing out and oil blowing it's top as it goes onwards into it's 25mth bull run please refer Oil on a 25mth cyclical bull run. Update 9 - US Dollar weakness and a possible oil spike above $100.00 with China being the big net importer of oil. If the oil price keeps the steady incline and the Chinese now cannot fix a lower YUAN (CNY) against the USD; as the Fed has, by default, trapped the Chinese to keep their YUAN devalued, otherwise a mass of hot inflows of money will go into the Yuan. Creating a speculative bubble of the currency. China's inflation problem just got a lot worst, as most South America countries will find out and the rest Asia (that trade their currencies freely on the markets). Hence the currency wars, which will go 'nuclear' (phrase).

This should occur very quickly as emerging markets digest the insanity of Ben Bernanke and the Federal Reserve of America.

At this point it's wise to watch the the response of Asia regarding the oil price and the weak US dollar, a high oil price usually crunches Singapore and Japan, with China at a inflation tipping point, and oil inflation at an economic breaking point should now send their property markets into crash realms. This would occur when the Chinese sell their speculative properties so they can keep their cars running.

refer to oil chart with US dollar. (Note the widening divergence between the oil price and USD.)


The issue with imported oil inflation (Asia/South America) from the Feds (ala Ben Bernanke) love of USD destruction. Is economies and merging economies have still got inflated stimulus programs running, of course namely China. The debt crisis in Europe is still offset with inflation that is a spill over by the maniacal government spending programs in 2009 which lead to price bubbles (housing) So oil may only need to rise towards $90.00, with could then increase the pain on already topped out/bubbles.

We are about to head into a world of hurt.

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

Commodity producing countries under pressure (political/economic - Australia) - exports starting to crunch on AUD bubble (update 11)


BALANCE ON GOODS AND SERVICES
Trend estimates
2 254
2 338
2 368
. .
Seasonally adjusted
1 704
2 446
1 760
. .
CREDITS (Exports of goods & services)
Trend estimates
24 995
25 021
24 942
-
Seasonally adjusted
25 216
24 524
24 151
-2
DEBITS (Imports of goods & services)
Trend estimates
22 741
22 683
22 573
-
Seasonally adjusted
23 512
22 078
22 391
1


The Fed does 600billion in money printing; induces several 'mini' flash crashes.

The point is this, the markets have changed. If you are a 20yr veteran or a 10yr veteran, what has happened in less than 2yrs is unprecedented. Apart from the central banks feeding liquidity to the banking system globally, buying distressed assets accumulating en masse unrealized losses onto the balance sheets and abiding to an almost obsessive Keynesian stimulus/bailout 'everything' policy. Which hasn't bailed out the broader economy at all just the banks, which as we know have horded cash, but still suffer from funding issues. But the core psychological analysis of major market players particularly central banks, is they have gone insane. Their repetitive attempts at reviving economic conditions hasn't worked, yet they keep at the same process, the same attempt again and again and again. Not only have they become a 'drug dealer', but also the addict that is losing grip with reality. They have essentially lost their minds and control over the markets, which they never had control over in the first place. At the same time the private market players, the funds, more specifically the hedge funds are now grinding markets in tight bid/offer spreads via computer High Frequency Trading (HFT). We all should get used to this, it's not going away. It is a reality and one that minor players should adapt for, however you think that adaptation can occur.

Market chatter prior to the Fed decision was on the fact that the market believed that the Federal Reserve were going to buy goverment debt at the tune of 500billion. This would be disappointing in the sense the markets wanted a trillion plus to then shove back into equity purchases, yes the American populous would never see any benefit from the Fed money printing (as they haven't yet), of course the Fed doesn't do the over 500bilion but rather lifts it to 600billion. HFT trading locked in a figure at 500billion, this is obvious, please refer to the Dow prior to the Fed revealing the Quantitative Easing 2 (QE2) amount, HFT's sold on a panic drove it down from 11201 down to 11097 (104 point drop) in matter of minutes. At approximately 3:30pm the Fed releases it's amount which was over the 500billion psychological fear sell point. The market melted up very quickly as volume buys kicked in; but if you look at the volume prior to the mini flash crash, it had the trademark HFT 'grinding' on a tight bid/offer.

refer:



Mini flash crashes also occurred on the risk barometer currency the AUD, approximately at 6:00pm GMT four hrs after the Dow mini flash crash

refer:


YEN mini flash crash, which is interesting also a risk barometer currency, it appears the HFT USD sells (YEN buys) occurred at the same time as the AUD sells; approximately 6:00pm GMT time.

refer:

What needs to be watched is now HFT panic sells on something major, this is followed in Doomsday trades. To buy into equities on a mid/long term hold bases is his/her provocative. But, if we get a major sell mechanism kick in and it's due. The current market just doesn't function for long term holdings or maintain stable equity value. It will be sharp and sudden sells.

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

Finally some Austerity in America?

No more goverment spending and a full audit of the Federal Reserve? We hope.

CNN latest projection : Republicans 224, above the 218 seats for control vs Democrats 147. Democrats have control over Senate with 51 seats to Republican's 46. President Barack Obama has called likely next Republican House Majority Leader John Boehner to discuss jobs and cutting spending.

The World Bank smokes crack re: China GDP, 'inflation nothing to worry about'

Two things:

  1. Food inflation
  2. Oil inflation

Reuters link World Bank China Forecast

this is what the World Bank said in 2008 before China spent 586billion to 'save' their economy

"The bank's report said that most developing and emerging markets, like China, would outperform high-income countries as they were less directly exposed to the financial turmoil and would see a modest, orderly slowdown."


Ireland's CDS blowout default looms

Irelands bankruptcy is getting closer.

LONDON (Dow Jones)--Spreads on European corporate credit-default swap indexes were mixed Tuesday, as credit underperformed equities thanks to renewed worries about peripheral euro-zone countries that pushed the benchmark sovereign index wider.

Shortly after 1420 GMT, the Markit iTraxx Crossover index, which allows investors to buy or sell default protection on a basket of 50 mostly sub-investment grade European corporate borrowers, was one basis points tighter from Monday's close, at 453/457 basis points.

The Europe index of 125 high-grade borrowers, by contrast, was 0.75 basis points wider at 98.25/99.25 basis points, and the SovX Western Europe index of 15 sovereigns was four basis points wider at 161.1/162.5 basis points.

Weakness in the sovereign credit market often has more of an impact on the Europe index than the Crossover index, because Europe includes banks that are highly sensitive to sovereign instability.

The SovX index was led wider by its peripheral euro-zone sovereign constituents--those with a weaker fiscal position and/or credit rating. Ireland's five-year sovereign credit default swaps hit a fresh high of 525 basis points, up around 25 basis points from Monday's close, and Greece, Spain, and Portugal were also wider.

"Ireland is consistently above 500 basis points, and we're seeing some selling activity in bank bonds on the back of the sovereign move," said a trader, adding that the continuing peripheral weakness reflected moves by European Union leaders at last week's summit to set up a permanent mechanism for confronting a fiscal crisis in the euro-zone.

"Technically, you can argue that setting up some kind of sovereign restructuring process is the right thing to do, but to go public when markets are so fragile is madness," said Gary Jenkins, head of fixed-income research at Evolution Securities in London.

As well as moves in the sovereign market, credit investors are waiting the U.S. mid-term elections Tuesday and the FOMC meeting later Wednesday.

"Yesterday's [better-than-expected] ISM data probably increases the probability of a flexible and incremental approach from the Fed tomorrow that may slightly disappoint those hungry for the full liquidity commitment immediately," said Jim Reid, credit strategist at Deutsche Bank, in a note.

and

LONDON -(Dow Jones)- The Irish five-year credit default swap spread widened to a new record level Tuesday, according to data provider Markit.

The five-year credit default swap spread on Ireland was 27 basis points wider at 525 basis points, according to Markit. This means it now costs an average of $525,000 a year to insure $10 million of debt issued by the company.

CDS are tradable, over-the-counter derivatives that function like a default insurance contract for debt. If a borrower defaults, the protection buyer is paid compensation by the protection seller. Swap buyers may be protecting investments they own or simply making bearish bets against countries.

The Reserve Bank of Australia is now governing the country: increases interest rates to 4.75%. A total interest rate blowout coming

Australia has a hung parliament (a interesting trend that has occurred in the last year with commonwealth goverments, an sign of political upheaval to come?), or shared government the first time in 75yrs. So far the Australian government with it's shared minority have been relatively quite. Why? Well they are probably trying to gauge populous worries and fears before announcing some political/economic policies. Meanwhile the central bank of Australia: The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA), who operate, like most central banks in their own paradigm as a pseudo government. As we know from the US Federal Reserve, the power that a central bank has is almost above government. Pulling the cash value or the countries economic value levers at will, run by 'not in the real world' academics and arrogant individuals, who somehow think that they, being custodians of our economic system, know what is best for us. Of course they don't, they never did, in fact they cause more harm than good. In the case of the US Federal Reserve and the Fed Chief Ben Bernanke, it is questionable how mentally competent a person like that is and why on earth he wields so much power over a global currency that being the US Dollar. Which as we are all aware, he wishes under is instructions, to debase the USD.

The flipside of central bank extremities, as opposed to the US Fed, is the Reserve Bank of Australia which is governed by Glen Stevens, a Christian family man, who has been uber bullish on the Australia economy even pre 2008 global meltdown (when we were just about to meltdown). There was of course usually central bank denial of how severe the crisis ended up being and the fact that central banks of the world are now essentially still holding up the whole banking system. The point is the same arrogance and belief that a central bank/s operate
in some kind of shielded impunity away from reality of the real world and markets. The RBA has been extremely clueless to modern markets trends (as most central banks have), in fact the questionable aspect is how they are reading inflation numbers. They have been in denial of a mega bubble in housing, yet they feel it is manageable. But the Australian boom, or consumption driven boom after 2008 and when governments of the world/central banks flooded the world with the Keynesian stimulus/bailouts theory, fed directly into the Australian housing markets, which was re-inflated after 2008 recession. The housing market had still maintained inflated prices from 2000 when housing boom took place; Australia's housing boom had not corrected substantially in the 10ys included the 2008 recession, rather it maintained it's bubble with government stimulus. The mining sector enjoyed feeding off China's stimulus after 2008, but it has since waned after 2009, the US dollar began to slide, and commodity producing countries currency's began to increase in value; namely the Brazilian REAL, South Africa RAND, Colombian PESO, Argentinian PESO, New Zealand DOLLAR. Exports became more expensive China bought less at a low volume per price, so as 2010 begun, exports to China decreased but the marked up distribution/or price increases went upward. This explains why most export countries including Australia posted trade surpluses in 2010.

But, central banks/governments from Asia/South American and South Africa began to worry about their currencies appreciating too fast, hence the term Currency War, as followed on this blog. All these countries began to deprecating the currencies, or at least attempt to devalue their Foreign Exchange values in the last 6mths of 2010. Brazil being Australia's main competitor, particularly for Iron Ore, started to tax foreign bond holders, and inflows of foreign capital buying Brazilian assets. Australia didn't attempt any devaluation, or tax on foreign held assets, instead we had a government that played ball, a central bank that was caught in the headlights of rapid AUD appreciation played ball. Meaning? Well they didn't know what to do and with a astute arrogance towards social and economic conditions in Australia decided to sit pat. In the meantime massive bidding of the AUD took place via High Frequency Trading from Hedge Funds, banks etc. Instead they followed, a unadaptive central bank rule book mixed with old and antiquated polices to deal with (what they thought) is inflation based issues internally based. One being, as mention, the trade surplus and housing (which has peaked). The fallacy is that Australia isn't earning like it did in 2006 and 2007, if so the Australia's GDP would be going through the roof, it's CPI would blow out and lastly it's housing market (prices) would still be going upward. None of this is happening, CPI is weaker than an expected quarterly rises. Housing prices are flat to negative particulary in the mining states such as Queensland and Western Australia

The RBA's very ruff and not convincing argument is of course the China boom which, as discussed, we don't see in huge volumes of Iron Ore, as China is now hitting full capacity of Iron Ore stockpiles ; in other words a glut of raw material is now building up in China. If China is paying more for a smaller amounts, this would definitely not indicate that mining induced inflation is blowing out in Australia, especially when the biggest miner in the world (BHP) says the global economy is still vulnerable/fragile. So why have the RBA begun a tightening bias on the Australia economy? When most economies are loosening up monetary policy to accommodate a weak USD and a possible hard landing of China in 2011? It's anyones guess.

As discussed the RBA have no idea how brutal bidding takes place on the AUD. What they have done in all their infinite wisdom of global markets by trying to stop an inflated bubble in mining (which is what Stephens rambles on about but if a inflationary spill over was taken place we would see it in Perth Western Australia's property markets which has come to a grinding halt refer to ABS housing stats), is they (RBA) have created a speculative bubble in the AUD. Australia apart from mining relies on it's manufacturing, consumption (retail), services (financial, legal, consulting), medical research (Biotech), engineering, migration for it's economic growth. The RBA has ignored this as it's adjusts it's tightening bias upward thus causing overbidding via HFT's trading on the AUD. The export pressures will now be immense on the above industries. On top of all this is the housing bubble, which in fact was the consumption engine in 2009 after 2008 economic crisis. It was the wealth effect that drove internal consumption. Not mining, the GDP measured with CPI shows this throughput out 2009 and into 2010.

But still as discussed, the September quarter 2010 CPI has come in weaker, mining is hanging in there on low volume high priced exports, there is is a bubble in housing and a speculative bubble on the AUD. What does this all mean and lead too?:

1. the RBA is lead by a masochistic styled governor (Glenn Stevens) who has lost the plot on real Australian ecomomic conditions.
2. The speculative bubbles in housing and the AUD will probably burst in tandem, which will happen quite soon. If we do get a panic sell in the AUD it should spill over to Australian bonds as yields will plummet and the bond holders hold high yields (for a Aust housing risk) will sell. Of course the huge pressures on mortgage holders, worth the banks using the recent RBA 25% increase to increase their own with all banks passing on funding costs from 20% to 40%; with the Commonwealth Bank passing on the a huge 40% ontop of the RBA's 25%.
3. The RBA will destroy Australia's competitiveness
4. Credit inflation will begin to eat into small business/medium size business margins as profits/sales will plummet from interest payments.

So in conclusion, the RBA with the banks have created a smoke screen to pass on their own blow out funding costs using the Australia's terms of trade/surplus as the excuse. On a scale of central bank irresponsibility the RBA matches the Federal Reserve (US), with the Fed too low rates and the RBA too high. Another indication of central banks having too much power which end up being detrimental to the broader ecomomy/social structure.

The RBA will be responsible for bursting the housing bubble in Australia and the AUD bubble.

Australian cash rate now @4.75%